|
|
State of the Valley
Symposium
2004
Proceedings

Thank You!
Healthy Mountain
Communities would like to thank all the participants, speakers, and
sponsors of the 2nd annual State of the Valley Symposium
at the Hotel Colorado in Glenwood Springs. Your involvement made
the symposium a success. We look forward to organizing the 2005
symposium to further identify and explore issues and trends in the
Roaring Fork and Colorado River Valleys.
Special thanks
to the symposium sponsors including Alpine Bank, Colorado Mountain
College, Vail Leadership Institute, Valley View Hospital, Schmueser
Gordon Meyer, Sundeen & Son Construction, New Century Transportation
Foundation, Williams Production, Whitsitt & Gross, P.C., Sopris
Engineering, The Land Studio, Basalt Chamber of Commerce, Clarion
Associates, Lamont Planning Services, The Sopris Avenue Institute,
Linden Marketing Group, and the Unitarian Universalist Congregation
of Glenwood Springs for making the symposium possible.
Overview
The State of the Valley Symposium is
a forum to explore the health and wealth of the Roaring Fork and
Colorado River Valleys. The Symposium offers business
leaders, elected officials, planners, and residents a chance
to hear from local, state and nationally recognized
practitioners, analysts, and thinkers about issues and trends
in our region and how we can work together to thrive in an
ever changing world. Over 125 people attended last year’s
symposium.
New component in 2004! Keypad
Voting. With
keypad voting, each member of the audience holds a keypad and when
questions appear on the main screen each member of the audience keys
in their response. The results are presented immediately for
discussion in
PowerPoint
format
and creates a very interactive format for a meeting.
Click here to see the results from
the polling at the this year's symposium.
[BACK]

Year in Review
This
publication, the State of the Valley: the Year in Review is a
compilation of articles from local news sources on some of the key
issues and trends affecting the residents and communities of the
Roaring Fork and Colorado River Valleys. The timeframe covered in
this review is roughly from May 2003 to April 2004.
The categorization of a “key
issue” is a subjective one that is influenced by mission of Healthy
Mountain Communities- to help communities collaborate, innovate, and
prosper in an ever
changing world. The articles in this review are also
influenced by what gets regularly covered by the media.
Consequently, this review is far from comprehensive, but we hope
that the
scope of issues covered within reflect the range of
issues that effect the health, welfare of the
communities in our region. We also hope that this
review offers a perspective on the challenges and opportunities
facing our region and how together, we can create a place we are
proud to call home.
As the articles compiled in this review illustrate, the Roaring Fork
and Colorado River Valleys make up a dynamic region with dynamic
problems. There are also a number of innovative efforts to address
these problems. It is our hope that HMC’s efforts to foster
regional dialogue, provide quality information, and facilitate
collaborative strategies contributes to the rich ecology of
solutions taking shaping in the region.
[BACK]
Speaker Bios, & Presentations
Linda Venturoni
Director of Special Projects
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments
Linda Venturoni is the Director of Special Projects for the
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments
(NWCCOG). She performs community surveys, data analysis, special
studies, needs assessments, and trend analysis for member governments
in the north central mountain region of Colorado. She has worked
with NWCCOG for the last 22 years, which has been a time of
unprecedented growth and challenges for mountain resort communities.
Email:
lindav@nwc.cog.co.us
[BACK]
Jim Westkott
Director of the Demography Section
Colorado Department of Local Affairs
Jim Westkott is the Director of the
Demography
Section within the
Colorado Department of Local Affairs,
a position he has served in since 1995. For 12 years prior to
that he served as the Projections Demographer within the section.
Jim has also been an Assistant Professor in the College of
Architecture and Planning and Director of Comprehensive Planning for
the Philadelphia Metropolitan Planning Organization.
He has a Masters in Business Administration from the
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, and a Masters in Regional
Science / Economics and a Masters in City and Regional Planning from
the University of Pennsylvania.
Email:
jim.westkott@state.co.us
[BACK]

Representatives from the organizations working in areas related to
the
health and
wealth of the region shared the latest developments and promising
opportunities in their fields (affordable housing, energy
development, health insurance, planning, water, etc.)
View the
CommunityViz fly through of Four Mile Canyon (7mb)
[BACK]
Daniel Kemmis
Director of the Center for the Rocky Mountain
West, author of This Sovereign Land and Community and
the Politics of Place.
Bio at Center
of Rocky Mountain West
Recent Articles by Daniel Kemmis
A New
Vision for Governing Western Lands
[BACK]
Wade Buchanan
President of the
The Bell Policy Center
Wade Buchanan was
senior advisor, policy director and chief speech writer to former
Colorado Gov. Roy Romer. He also served as acting executive director
of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, director of the
Colorado Office of Energy Conservation, and chair of the Regional
Air Quality Council, the lead air quality agency for Metro Denver.
Wade has a B.A. in history from Colorado College and an M.Phil in
international relations from Oxford University in England, where he
was a Rhodes Scholar.
E-mail:
buchanan@thebell.org
[BACK]
At this year's symposium, each member of the audience held a keypad
and when questions appeared on the main screen each member of the
audience keyed in their response. The results were presented
immediately in PowerPoint format. We used this technology to
engage participants in assessing the state of the valley from their
perspective. The report summarizes the response to the
questions.
The audience
polling was managed by Ken
Snyder, Director of
PlaceMatters.
  
[BACK]
News Articles
The following articles report on some of the presentations at the
symposium.
Good examples of
collaboration in Valley
Carrie Click
Post Independent Staff
May 2, 2004
GLENWOOD SPRINGS —
The communities in the Roaring Fork and Colorado River valleys are
“great examples of the West growing up,” according to Daniel Kemmis,
former mayor of Missoula, Mont., and an expert on public policy,
land use and community building.
“This is a heck of a good example of getting it done right,” Kemmis
said of collaborative work being done in the Roaring Fork and
Colorado River Valley communities.
Kemmis spoke at the Hotel Colorado Friday as part of the second
annual State of the Valley Symposium, hosted by Healthy Mountain
Communities, a nonprofit Carbondale-based community organization
headed by Colin Laird.
Kemmis made his presentation, “New Visions Governing the West,” to
about 120 residents, business leaders and elected officials. The
symposium was open to the public and cost $65 for the day-long
event.
Grand Junction Mayor Jim Spehar, a Democrat who’s running for
Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District seat, introduced Kemmis to the
crowd, describing Kemmis as his mentor and teacher.
“There’s a lot of Western mythology surrounding the rugged
individual,” Spehar said. “What Dan has taught me is that you can’t
do it individually. RFTA and the valley’s affordable housing
projects are examples of that. You need to concentrate on what
unites you — on what you have in common. Communities need to
collaborate. That’s the gospel according to Daniel.”
Kemmis’ presentation followed brief reports from regional
organizations working on valley-wide issues. (See related story
below.)
“I see you all have an obvious commitment to the region as a whole,”
Kemmis said. “Even though the people in this room are from many
different communities, you’re working effectively together. Give
yourselves credit for how far you’ve come.”
He said the West’s aridity, and the region’s dependence on limited
sources of water, are key factors in dealing with local community
needs like affordable housing, transportation and land use planning.
“All of these things are affected by our need for water. It’s
important to understand our interrelationships with watersheds,” he
said. “At this point in history, people are realizing the importance
of watersheds and the importance of working together. It’s a
phenomenon of historical proportions that’s happening right here in
this room, and in this valley.
“We’ve had a set way of doing things, and now we’ve had time to
understand what works and what really doesn’t work,” said Kemmis.
“I want to leave you with this thought,” Kemmis said. “Personally, I
have great faith in the West. People like you are taking
responsibility for a highly impressive level of citizenship.
“Maybe you had an idea before that somebody was going to make all of
this work — but there’s nobody there,” Kemmis added. “We’re going to
have to do it ourselves. That awareness has dawned on a lot of
people — and that’s good news.”
Contact Carrie Click: 945-8515, ext. 518
cclick@postindependent.com
[BACK]
Summaries of symposium presentations
Carrie Click
Post Independent Staff
May 2, 2004
The State of the
Valley Symposium held Friday featured a variety of presentations on
current social and political issues. Here are summaries.
• Oil and gas drilling, presented by Doug Dennison, Garfield
County oil and gas auditor.
Dennison reported that Garfield County is now the most active
gas-producing county in the state. He said 35 rigs are currently
operating, accounting for half the rigs in Colorado.
In 2003, 566 well permits were approved; already in 2004, 174 well
permits have been approved, and he estimated more than 700 wells
would be approved by year’s end.
Dennison said the newly formed Garfield County Energy Advisory
Board, composed of people “from both sides of the table,” has had
two meetings, and said the next meeting is at 6 p.m., Thursday at
the Rifle Fire Station. The public, as always, is invited.
• Labor issues and the immigrant, presented by Tom Ziemann of
Catholic Charities.
Ziemann said Catholic Charities is continuing to advocate for fair
pay and safe conditions for immigrant workers.
He said two community advocates working in Glenwood Springs and Avon
are assisting immigrants with mediations between employers over
disputes in pay, particularly among undocumented workers.
He said the results of unsafe or unfair business dealings
contributes to hatred, division and crime, and encouraged people to
contact their legislators to create more stringent labor laws that
will help to alleviate these problems.
• Watershed issues, presented by Kristine Crandall of the Roaring
Fork Conservancy and Cindy Houben.
Houben and Crandall described the Watershed Collaborative, a group
researching and providing information on watershed issues in Pitkin,
Eagle and Garfield counties. The research includes working with the
Division of Water Resources, the Colorado River Water Conservation
District, the Nature Conservancy and the United States Geological
Survey, to collect data on river flow, fluctuations, water quality
and sustainable watershed management.
• Affordable housing, presented by Susan Shirley of Mountain
Regional Housing Corporation.
Shirley said communities are better when they include people from
all economic levels. She said the MRHC’s housing rental and sale
program is geared towards households making between $16,000 (single)
to $92,000 (family).
MRHC acts as a nonprofit developer in rental and for-sale housing,
and has been instrumental in valley-wide projects including Thompson
Corner in Carbondale, the Ullr Commons in Aspen and White River
Village in Rifle. The organization also offers home buyer classes.
• Energy efficient construction, presented by Steve Novy of Novy
Architects and Joani Matranga of the Community Office for Resource
Efficiency.
Novy told the crowd, “Energy efficiency makes sense for long-term
affordability.”
Matranga said,
working in part with Novy, CORE is helping people build energy
efficient homes locally according to Building America
specifications, including passive solar design, increased
insulation, high efficiency furnaces, water conservation and xeri-landscaping.
• Leadership development, presented by Virginia Newton of Roaring
Fork Leadership.
Newton explained that Roaring Fork Leadership, a 16-year-old
Aspen-based leadership program that serves people from the Roaring
Fork Valley, accepts individuals from the for-profit and nonprofit
sectors. Once a month for nine months, the group meets to listen to
speakers, learn conflict resolution, enhance organizational skills
and build community connections.
• Health care, presented by Lori Hogan of the Glenwood Springs
Chamber Resort Association.
Roaring Fork Valley Community Health Plan, Hogan explained, began in
1993 to promote quality health care and health education to
individuals and small businesses at an affordable cost. The
organization now serves communities from Aspen to Rifle and offers
group and individual health plans that address the needs of rural
communities.
The coverage is provided by a leading insurance company and
distributed by local brokers.
• Computer map planning, presented by Garfield County planner
Randy Russell and Glenwood Springs city planner Mike Pelletier.
Russell and Pelletier demonstrated a computer mapping program that
helps planning departments assess an area’s current status, and what
it might look like at build out.
Using a projection screen and a laptop computer, Pelletier guided
the audience on a simulated flight over the Four Mile area, showing
what the area looks like now, and what it will look like if plans
for developments, such as the former Red Feather Ridge subdivision,
the Bershenyi property, and an Oak Meadows and Sunlight Mountain
Resort expansion, are realized.
Contact Carrie Click: 945-8515, ext. 518
cclick@postindependent.com
[BACK]
Study:
2nd homes are No. 1 economic factor
Scott Condon
May 3, 2004
It's official: Aspen can no
longer be rightfully called a tourist town.
A study released Friday quantifies that second
homes are now the biggest economic engine in Pitkin County -
dwarfing tourism during ski seasons and summers.
The study by the Northwest Colorado Council of
Governments showed that second homes accounted for 34 percent of all
dollars coming into the county from outside sources in 2001.
The study estimated that $1.32 billion flowed
into the county from outside sources. Construction on second homes
accounted for $115.5 million, and spending by occupants of those
second homes - on everything from home furnishings to fancy dinners
- accounted for another $337.6 million.
An earlier study by the council of governments
showed that 55 percent of all housing units in Pitkin County were
second homes.
All told, second homes were
responsible for bringing $453.1 million into the
county in 2001, or 34 percent, the study showed.
In comparison, winter tourism accounted for 22
percent of outside dollars flowing into Pitkin County. Destination
skiers, those coming to Aspen and Snowmass Village and staying at
least one night, accounted for $232.5 million while nonlocal day
skiers pumped $42.7 million into the economy; other winter visitors
brought $14.2 million.
Summer destination visitors and day-trippers
accounted for 18 percent of $244.5 million, the study estimated.
Tourism was even topped by income that permanent
county residents make from outside sources. That includes everything
from dividends and interest, rent from property outside the county
and retirees' incomes. That accounted for a whopping $312.8 million,
or 24 percent of outside dollars.
Skiing no longer king in region
The study was unveiled Friday by Linda
Venturoni, director of special projects for the Northwest Colorado
Council of Governments. She was a featured speaker at Healthy
Mountain Community's "State of the Roaring Fork Valley Symposium" in
Glenwood Springs. The symposium was designed to identify trends
evolving in the valley so governments can plan accordingly.
Venturoni said second homes are dominating more
than just Pitkin County's economy.
"Second homes are the largest economic driver in
the region," she said.
The study examined a four-county region: Eagle,
Summit and Grand counties as well as Pitkin. Vail and Beaver Creek
are in Eagle County. Breckenridge, Dillon, Silverthorne and Frisco
are in Summit, and Winter Park and Fraser are in Grand.
For the region as a whole, an estimated $5.3
billion in outside dollars flowed in during 2001. Second-home
construction and spending by occupants accounted for 34 percent of
those dollars while winter tourism was at 28 percent.
That's significant because those four counties
compose the heart of Colorado ski country. They account for about 70
percent of the annual skier visits in the state. Nonetheless, skiing
has slipped as an economic driver.
Since this is the first study of its kind,
there's no way to tell when second homes supplanted winter tourism
in the economy. Pitkin County Commission Mick Ireland, another
speaker at the symposium, said he guesses it was the mid- to
late-1990s.
Vail's life blood
While second homes are vital to Aspen's economy,
they are the life blood of Vail's. Second-home construction and
spending by occupants accounted for 38 percent of the outside
dollars coming into Eagle County in 2001, the study showed.
Winter tourism was a distant second at 22
percent. Eagle County residents' income from outside sources
accounted for 21 percent of all outside dollars. Summer tourism
brought in only 9 percent.
Winter tourism still reigns supreme in Summit
and Grand counties. Summit County relied on winter tourism for 39
percent of outside dollars while second homes accounted for 32
percent.
Winter and summer tourism each accounted for 27
percent of the outside dollars flowing into Grand County while
second homes brought in 24 percent, the study showed.
Venturoni and symposium speaker Jim Westkott,
the state's demographer, made a convincing case that second homes
will have an even greater impact on the area in the next two
decades.
National studies show that most second homes are
bought or built for people between ages 55 and 64. Baby Boomers, the
largest age group, are just moving into that bracket.
"We know that this trend that we've identified
will be peaking in the next 18 years," Venturoni said.
"You thought you had a lot of second homes built
in the 1990s?" Westkott asked rhetorically.
Second homes produce problems
While second homes bring a lot of outside
dollars into the region, they also bring a myriad of problems,
Venturoni and Ireland warned.
Ireland said Pitkin County is experiencing a
trend that, at first blush, appears to be a paradox - new jobs
continue to be generated but retail sales are flat or even down. The
reason, he said, is second homes tend to generate more service jobs
than jobs that generate retail sales taxes, which fuel local
government funding.
Second homes need landscapers, gardeners, chefs,
caterers and maids. Growth in the number of workers requires growth
in governmental services such as schools, streets, police forces and
fire departments. Yet governments must meet those demands without
greater sales tax revenues.
Ireland also credited wealthy second-home owners
for shaping Aspen's much-discussed high-end retail scene. Many
people lament that Aspen has too few shops that cater to a broad
spectrum of people, including working locals.
Ireland said stores cater to the wealthiest
potential customers, not the greatest number of potential customers.
That's why art galleries and stores selling $500 purses have
proliferated at the expense of stores with more modestly priced
goods.
Venturoni said rampant development of second
homes has stamped land use in the four-county region. "This driver
is crowding out all other uses," she said.
Schools, health services and other community
organizations find themselves "squeezed for space," she said.
The second-home market has also gobbled up
worker housing for redevelopment or driven up the price of land so
that worker housing cannot be built, Venturoni noted. That's led to
the downvalley migration of workers now so common in many of the
resort areas.
At the same time second homes are placing such a
squeeze for space within communities, it's generating jobs that also
cause local populations to grow - and bring their own set of
problems, Venturoni noted (see related story).
Scott Condon's e-mail address
is
scondon@aspentimes.com
[BACK]

Second homes new reality for valley
David Frey
March 5-11, 2004
Maybe it was the endless parade of dump
trucks up and down Highway 82. Maybe it was the chronic state of
“under construction” this valley has been in.
For a long time, a lot of us have had a
nagging suspicion that these aren’t really tourist towns at all.
These are construction towns. It’s not snow that keeps this valley
afloat. It’s dirt.
A recent study by the Northwest Colorado
Council of Governments has confirmed that, and for many, it’s not
good news. The study found that second homes are a bigger economic
engine in Pitkin County than skiing or summer tourism. And it’s not
just here. In fact, it’s even more the case in Eagle County, where
Vail is a second-home owner’s paradise.
The good news is, that means lots of money
coming in to build, equip and elegantly appoint homes that are only
lived in a couple months out of the year. It means jobs for
gardeners, chefs, caretakers and maids.
The bad news: second homes create service
jobs, but not jobs that lead to new sales tax dollars. That means
governments are left to increase services for these workers –
schools, streets, police – without more tax dollars to do it.
Pitkin County Commissioner Mick Ireland
suggests the trend in second-home ownership also accounts for
Aspen’s retail woes. Stores cater to the wealthy with posh boutiques
and pricey art galleries, not to the stuff most of us need.
NWCCOG’s Linda Venturoni, who conducted the
study, says the second-home market is snatching up land that could
be used for development, worker housing, and institutions like
schools, and it’s pushing the workers who serve these second-home
owners farther and farther downvalley.
The worse news: it’s not over. In fact, her
study says, it’s just beginning. Based on a national study of
second-home ownership, forecasters think we’re just two years into
an 18-year trend as baby boomers take their retirement money and buy
up property.
“You thought you had a lot of second homes
built in the 1990s?” asked Jim Westkott, as quoted in the Aspen
Times.
Well, yes, I did.
The study didn’t include Garfield County.
Too bad, because I’d love to see those numbers. That’s where a lot
of the workers on second homes live. That’s where a lot of the
businesses that build and serve them are based. And increasingly,
that’s where second homes are being built.
If this trend seems like old news on Red
Mountain or Snowmass Village, it’s only been within the last decade
that towns like Carbondale and Glenwood Springs have seen
developments pop up designed in large part to serve second-home
owners and their cravings for golf while they’re in town. More and
more, towns like New Castle, Silt and Rifle, and the ranch land that
surrounds them, are seeing second-home owners moving in (and moving
out, and moving in, and moving out).
It was Marc Adler, a former Glenwood Springs
mayor, who once noted that no matter how built up this valley got,
and no matter how intolerable it seemed to locals who remembered
when developments were open space, somewhere else would always be
worse, and the growth wouldn’t stop.
Seems like that’s what we’re seeing here.
NWCCOG unveiled its study last week at the
group Healthy Mountain Community’s State of the Roaring Fork Valley
symposium.
The numbers themselves are pretty
interesting. The study found that in 2001, 34 percent of the money
from outside sources came as a result of second homes. Construction
alone accounted for $115.5 million. Once the houses are up and open
for entertaining, the flow of dollars continues. Spending on
curtains, cocktails and caviar accounted for $337.6 million. Why
wasn’t I invited?
Think Aspen and Snowmass are ski towns? Uh
uh. Winter tourism accounted for just 22 percent of outside dollars
coming into the county. Most of that money came from destination
skiers, who left behind $232.5 million.
Summer visitors accounted for just 18
percent, or $244.5 million.
Those figures are even more skewed in Eagle
County, where second-home owners accounted for 38 percent of outside
dollars. In Summit and Grand counties, on the other hand, skiing
still reigns supreme, but second homes are close behind.
Second homes also bring in more jobs. About
44 percent of the “basic jobs” created through the flow of outside
dollars were tied to second-home building and spending. Only 25
percent were tied to winter tourism, and another to 11 percent due
to summer tourism.
The jobs and the money are nice, of course,
but there’s a price to be paid in the impacts on workers, and land
values. And there’s a price to be paid in communities where the
living room lights are off most of the year.
Welcome to the new reality of the Roaring
Fork Valley. See you again next winter.
(Venturoni’s presentation is on NWCCOG’s Web
site, www.nwc.cog.co.us.)
[BACK]
Sponsors


Vail Leadership Institute


Sundeen & Son Construction, LLC
New Century
Transportation Foundation
Whitsitt & Gross,
P.C.
S opris Engineering
The Land Studio
The Sopris Avenue Institute


Lamont Planning Services, LLC
.jpg)
Unitarian
Universalist
Congregation of Glenwood Springs
[BACK]
|