State of the Valley Symposium 2008 Articles

September 23, 2008

West Slope struggling with 'clash of economies'

Scott Condon
The Aspen Times
Aspen, CO Colorado

At a time when many parts of the country are struggling with soaring unemployment, plummeting real estate values and an onslaught of property foreclosures, western Colorado’s economy sticks out as an oddball.

There are plenty of problems in the Roaring Fork Valley and lower Colorado River Valley; they are just the opposite of those in the rest of the country.

There is a shortage of workers rather than jobs. Home prices remain out of reach for most workers, even if values have temporarily hit a plateau.

Western Colorado’s economy is fueled by the oil and gas boom. Garfield County is a hotbed of drilling for natural gas, with 2,550 permits issued for gas wells last year, up 38 percent from 2006.

The upper Roaring Fork Valley remains an economic engine whose fires are stoked by recreation as well as construction and residency of second homes.

There is an irony at work, said Colin Laird, executive director of Healthy Mountain Communities, a nonprofit organization focused on collaborative approaches to solving regional problems. There is a national appetite for oil and natural gas at the same time there is a national appetite among retiring Baby Boomers for second homes in desirable resort areas.

“They both are hitting us at the same time,” he said.

The region remains prosperous, even as much of the rest of the country suffers a general economic malaise. “We’re sort of insulated in a way,” Laird said.
But that two-headed economy also creates problems. The gas boom this decade has created hundreds of relatively high-paying jobs. Consequently, the resort sector struggles to find enough workers to load chairlifts, clean toilets and serve food.

Towns like New Castle, Silt and Rifle provided affordable housing for workers willing to commute to good-paying jobs in Aspen and Snowmass Village. Now those residents are sticking closer to home for jobs that often pay as well or better.

And the high demand for housing for workers heading both directions has evaporated the last remaining affordable options.

Call it a “clash of economies,” said Ben Alexander, associate director of Headwaters Economics, an independent, nonprofit research group that strives to improve community development and land management decisions in the West.

It’s not just the energy economy battling the resort economy, he said. High-paying jobs in the gas patch not only make it tough for employers in Aspen to find enough workers, it also makes it tough to find everything from carpenters to retail clerks in towns like Rifle.

“Every industry is competing against every other industry,” said Alexander.

Healthy Mountain Communities is hosting a symposium Friday, Oct. 24, in Glenwood Springs to explore the economic dynamics of western Colorado. The sixth annual State of the Valley Symposium is called “Economic Clashes and Regional Prosperity.”

Alexander will be one of the keynote speakers. Headwaters Economics has done extensive research into how energy development is changing the economy of the West. Garfield and Pitkin counties combine to make a fascinating case study, he said.

There are a number of possible scenarios that could evolve in the next few years to affect the regional economy, Alexander said. One could be a cooling of the gas industry, which he said is “really ripping” right now. National demand for natural gas is flat at a time when the U.S. supply is up significantly.

“We’ve got more than we can use right now, and we’ve developed more than we can use right now,” Alexander said.

Randy Udall, a Carbondale energy expert, said extraction techniques developed in Colorado and Texas are being applied to shale gas fields in Oklahoma, Louisiana, New York and Pennsylvania “with surprisingly positive results.”

It could result in lower natural gas prices and reduced drilling pressure in the Rockies, Udall said.

If that’s the case, gas companies may sit on more leases and develop them over a greater amount of time, Alexander said. Western Colorado would evolve more into maintenance and monitoring rather than drilling, and that would require less labor and potentially ease the shortage.

Another scenario, Alexander said, is development of more demand for natural gas. The use of coal at power-production plants is under fire because of its high release of greenhouse gases. Pressure may grow to use cleaner-burning natural gas, ensuring continued heavy exploration and drilling in places like the Piceance Basin, which includes western Garfield County.

A third possible scenario foreseen by Alexander is continued clashing between the economic drivers, prolonging competition for labor. If that happens, the resort economy of the upper Roaring Fork Valley and the economic sectors in Garfield County must adjust wages to compete with gas companies.

Headwaters Economics analysts were surprised to find there hasn’t been greater wage adjustment already, Alexander said. Average wages are only up in a few sectors of the economy, but not across the board. Meanwhile, soaring housing costs and general cost-of-living expenses have made it even tougher for workers who didn’t see their wages increase, Alexander said.

“I think there has to be more wage inflation,” he said.

In the bigger picture, Alexander wants to use next month’s symposium to help local decision-makers ponder how the two economic drivers can coexist and “how to foster and sustain economic diversity in the region.”

In addition to Alexander, the event will feature speakers Jim Westkott, a senior demographer with the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, and state Treasurer Cary Kennedy.

The cost to attend the 2008 State of the Valley Symposium is $75 and includes lunch and materials. It will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Hotel Colorado in Glenwood Springs. Last year’s event attracted about 175 people, Laird said.
 

October 25, 2008

Aspen’s big chill: the economy
Experts say second-home development will slow for immediate future; Garfield County’s gas drilling may level off

Scott Condon
The Aspen Times
Aspen CO Colorado

The two engines that superheated the economies of Aspen and western Colorado for most of this decade are getting chilled by the national economic meltdown, two experts said Friday.

Second-home development has already tumbled and activity will continue to be slow for the foreseeable future, according to Jim Westkott, the senior demographer for the state of Colorado.

And the frenetic pace of drilling for natural gas in western Garfield County will likely level off because of the economy and infrastructure limitations, said Ben Alexander, associate director of a nonprofit research group called Headwaters Economics.

The men were featured speakers at the annual State of the Valley conference hosted Healthy Mountain Communities in Glenwood Springs on Friday. Healthy Mountain Communities is a Roaring Fork Valley-based nonprofit that helps governments in the region identify issues and solutions.

Westkott said tourism in the Roaring Fork Valley will be hurt by the national economic climate and that a recession will result in the loss of some jobs in the retail and service sectors. Second-home development “will slow considerably,” he said.

Inflated real estate prices haven’t deterred aging baby boomers from gobbling property in Aspen and other mountain paradises in recent years, Westkott said. Their influx and the jobs they create through demands for service have spurred explosive growth in western Colorado.

The drastic drop in second-home development has convinced Westkott and his staff to reconsider growth projections. They don’t believe Eagle and Pitkin counties will grow as fast as they projected as recently as last year — although both counties will continue to grow.

He said the baby boomers will flock to places like Aspen and Vail once the economy improves, and that the current slump creates no reason to panic. “You don’t need to go off chasing bucks,” Westkott said.

Garfield County’s growth will remain closer to projections due to the energy-based economy, he said.

“Natural gas will continue to create some new jobs and population growth, but its development is currently limited by pipeline capacity out of the state,” Westkott said. Alexander said demand is flat for natural gas and that prices, while volatile, have dropped in recent months. That suggests that drilling activity might level off. Western Garfield County has been “ground zero” for the energy boom this decade, along with the area around Pinedale, Wyo., he said.

That boom has created problems. There are more jobs than workers in western Colorado, Alexander noted, so any new openings essentially require the region to import workers. The resort economies of Aspen, Snowmass Village, Glenwood Springs and Vail are competing with the gas patch for workers.

“If you’re not a drug addict you can get a job if you want a job,” Alexander said.

The energy industry pays well, but other fields haven’t kept pace. That makes it difficult to hire essential community workers like teachers and police officers, let alone maids and restaurant workers.

The creation of well-paying jobs and importation of workers has driven up housing prices and the overall cost-of-living in the area. The lack of affordable housing that has long plagued the Roaring Fork and Eagle valleys has now spread to the Grand Valley and places like Rifle, Alexander said.

Meanwhile, Garfield County has done little to diversify its economy, making it susceptible to a bust, according to Alexander.

“A slowdown on the West Slope wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing,” he said. He stressed that he wasn’t promoting job loss or financial hardship for anyone. He believes a cooling off would relieve some of the market forces like the lack of housing and competition for jobs. “It may afford a little breathing room,” he said.

Westkott concurred. “This will bring things down to earth and in the long-term it’s probably a good thing,” he said of the economic climate. Like Alexander, he urged leaders in western Colorado to use the reprieve as a time to plan their communities’ futures.
 

October 30, 2008

State of the Valley Report
Part I / Part II

Diversity is the key to economic success


Jeremy Heiman
The Valley Journal

The strength of the local econo­my is in its diversity.

That message was delivered by ex­perts on western economies who ad­dressed participants at the State of the Valley Symposium presented by Carbondale-based Healthy Mountain Communities last Friday at the Hotel Colorado in Glenwood Springs.

 “More diverse economies are not only more resilient, they also grow faster,” said Ben Alexander, associ­ate director of Headwaters Eco­nomics, a Montana-based nonprof­it research group.

The more dependent our econo­my is on the natural gas industry, the more vulnerable we are to forces outside the area, he said.

“Natural gas futures have gone from $6 to $13 to $6 in the last year,” Alexander said. “We’ve got to hedge against that volatility, and the best way we know is diversity in the economy,” Alexander said.

Jim Westkott, senior demographer for the State of Colorado’s Depart­ment of Local Affairs, urged his lis­teners at the symposium to protect the scenic values of the region, the main attraction of the tourism economy.

“You’ve got to remember, us folks like coming up here,” said Westkott, who lives on the Front Range.

“You have a very beautiful, valuable region,” Westkott said later. “Don’t sell it off. You need a long­term economic strategy. You’ll get along just fine.”

 Big, but not that big

Mark Haggerty, Alexander’s col­league at Headwaters Economics, said that of all the western energy­producing states, Colorado has the largest economy, and the percent­age of Colorado’s economy con­tributed by the energy industry is the smallest of any of the states, on­ly about 1 percent.

He suggested that Colorado needs to tax the energy industry at a greater rate than it currently does, to put the state in a better position to mitigate the environmental and infrastructure damage and social disruption caused by energy extraction.

“This a source of wealth, and you ought to be generating net benefits for the people of the region,” Haggerty said.

Though Alexander said demand for natural gas may soon decline, Vince Matthews, of Colorado Geological Survey, said gas drilling probably won’t go away in the near term.

“I believe we’re going to have a natural gas shortage in the United States.” Matthews said. “This drilling in the Rockies has been successful, but when you look at the national picture, we’re flat with what we were 10 years ago.”

Catering to retirees
Alexander said energy extraction and min­ing together, as of 2006, makes up about 10 percent of local dollars. As a percentage of the local economy it is small compared to the contribution of retirees. The energy economy locally is about $180 million, whereas the non-work economy, fueled by investment and retirees, is more like $400 million, he said.

Westkott suggested developing a wider range of services for retirees.

“One of the things you have to remember is the boomers who are going to move here are going to go through a lot of different stages as their lifestyles change, as they get old,” he said. They will require different services, activities and products as they go through the stages of aging.

Despite its relatively small size, Alexander said, the energy industry is having significant effects on the region. One study Headwaters did in Mesa County, which also has seen a huge boom in gas drilling, showed that energy industry wages were growing at 7 percent annually while wages in other industries were growing at 1 per­cent. With that kind of money around, living costs rise to whatever level the best-paid workers can afford.

“All of a sudden, these folks are setting prices for a lot of commodities,” Alexander said.

In Garfield County, gas field wages are pulling workers out of the construction in­dustry.

“This makes housing less and less affordable,” Alexander said.

But the worldwide economic slowdown may relax the housing crunch somewhat, he said.

State of the Valley Report
Part I / Part II

Downturn probably won’t be of help with housing affordability

By Jeremy Heiman

 The Valley Journal

A panel of housing wonks agreed Friday that the current trouble in the nation’s financial markets probably won’t provide a solution for the on­going lack of affordable housing in the Roaring Fork Valley.

But the participants did have some insights that might help develop a strat­egy to bring more housing on line even­tually. The panel discussion was part of the annual State of the Valley Sympo­sium presented by Carbondale-based Healthy Mountain Communities at the Hotel Colorado in Glenwood Springs.

Panelist Don Ensign, a co-founder of Design Workshop and a developer of mixed-use projects in the Roaring Fork Valley, told those in attendance that the lack of funds for mortgage lending would cut into the number of people who were able to get financing, and it would also reduce capital available for development of all kinds.

“Many people who would have previously qualified no longer can get mortgages,” Ensign said. “And when this is over, there will be a pent-up demand and no supply.”

Panelist Joe Rowan, executive direc­tor of Funding Partners, a mortgage spe­cialist, put partial blame for the lending crisis on people’s mistaken idea that wealth was in having one’s name on a deed rather than having cash in hand.

“This way of thinking has given rise to speculation,” Rowan said. He said the hard times that will result from the market decline may bring people to their senses.

“As this starts to shake out, we’ll get back to the old-fashioned way of getting things,” Rowan said. “What it means is you have to be physically, mentally and financially ready to be a homeowner.”

Housing is housing


“The people that teach our kids and police our community need a place to live,” Rowan said. But he re­minded the audience that home owner­ship is perhaps not the only goal.

“Renting is a legitimate way of be­ing part of the community, but couch surfing is not renting. It’s one step above homelessness.”

Alex Potente, managing director of the Eagle County Housing Office, guessed that the downturn wouldn’t help to bring prices into the affordable range. “The housing in this market is too high-cost and too high-quality to ever be affordable,” Potente said. He second­ed Rowan’s concern about rentals, too.

“Another big problem is rental stock,” Potente continued. “It’s hard as hell to build rental stock, even in a good economic environment.”

On the subject of what tools can be used to get housing into the affordable range, Ensign said ideas currently in use mostly have unintended conse­quences. Requiring developers to con­struct ADUs, or accessory dwelling units, with free market houses drives up the cost of building anything.

Exactions — charges added to develop­ment fees to accumulate money for afford­able housing — spell an increase in the cost of all real estate, Ensign said. Exac­tions used to create affordable housing are passed on to the community, too, he said.

Shoveling money at the problem has been effective in Aspen, where consid­erable housing has been built at below­market prices, Ensign continued. But downvalley communities don’t have the wealth that Aspen can tap.

Land, ho

 
Ensign did have optimism for two ideas that might be part of a solution, though. One was land.

“I think an effective way of thinking about it is real estate in our valley is wealth,” Ensign said. “There’s a lot of land that is underutilized, and could be used for affordable housing.” He said public entities, including valley towns, own land in places where denser develop­ment would be appropriate, and that pub­lic ownership could bring down the costs. Ensign also advocated bringing a re­al estate transfer tax into the equation to develop a revenue stream for future housing subsidies.

“My suggestion is that each project have a transfer tax,” Ensign said. “Every unit in a project has an 11 percent trans­fer tax, which diminishes to maybe a 3 percent transfer tax over a few years. That discourages speculation.”

Every time these units sell, there would be a 3 percent rider that goes in­to a public housing fund, he continued. This money would be on hand to buy down a 3 percent to 6 percent increase in equity every time a unit is sold.

Rowan, the mortgage banker, said though money isn’t available at pres­ent, now is the time to be planning and lining up possible advantages, such as tax credits that are available for devel­opers who build affordable housing.

Ready when opportunity knocks


“Right now the financial communi­ty has their head on their desk, and they’re waiting for recess,” Rowan said. “Don’t jump into anything right now, but be working as hard as you ever have, lining up tax advantages, and making sure that all the parties are at the table, so nothing is missed.”

Potente said it’s important to find a site and push for more density to maximize the number of units that can be built.

“While you can only get so much blood from stones,” he said, “you have to look at density.

He said his office is looking at de­veloping housing at the tree nursery in El Jebel, where Ace Lane’s water ski lake is. Potente said it’s a good site, but he anticipates a NIMBY reaction.

“The neighbors are going to say, ‘God no, I don’t want more traffic and I don’t want rental housing next to my $6 million home.’” To overcome this, the community as whole has to say they want it, he said.

Ensign said he’s worked on the af­fordable housing problem as a consult­ant and as developer, and hasn’t suc­ceeded in cracking it. So he’s thinking of running for public office, he said, eliciting laughter. Because, he contin­ued, public officials have the leverage to get something like this done.